
在 FastAPI 中实现三层架构,特别是处理需要多个服务协同的复杂端点时,如何有效地组织代码至关重要。本文将深入探讨两种方案,并提供选择合适方案的指导,以实现更好的可维护性和可扩展性。
三层架构是一种常见的软件设计模式,它将应用程序分为三个逻辑层:
在处理复杂端点时,我们需要仔细考虑如何在这些层之间分配职责,以确保代码的清晰性和可维护性。
这种方案将多个服务的调用逻辑放在应用层(即 FastAPI 端点定义处)。例如,对于 get_transaction 端点,应用层将直接调用 userService、productService 和 saleService 来获取所需的数据,然后将这些数据组合成 transactionDto 对象并返回。
示例代码:
from fastapi import FastAPI, Depends
from typing import Dict
app = FastAPI()
# 假设的 Service 定义
class UserService:
def get_user(self, user_id: int) -> Dict:
# 模拟数据库查询
return {"user_id": user_id, "name": "Example User"}
class ProductService:
def get_product(self, product_id: int) -> Dict:
# 模拟数据库查询
return {"product_id": product_id, "name": "Example Product"}
class SaleService:
def get_sale(self, sale_id: int) -> Dict:
# 模拟数据库查询
return {"sale_id": sale_id, "amount": 100}
# 依赖注入
def get_user_service():
return UserService()
def get_product_service():
return ProductService()
def get_sale_service():
return SaleService()
# 端点定义
@app.get("/transactions/{transaction_id}")
async def get_transaction(
transaction_id: int,
user_service: UserService = Depends(get_user_service),
product_service: ProductService = Depends(get_product_service),
sale_service: SaleService = Depends(get_sale_service),
):
user = user_service.get_user(1)
product = product_service.get_product(1)
sale = sale_service.get_sale(transaction_id)
transaction = {
"transaction_id": transaction_id,
"user": user,
"product": product,
"sale": sale,
}
return transaction优点:
缺点:
这种方案创建一个专门的 transactionService 来聚合来自其他服务的数据。transactionService 将调用 userService、productService 和 saleService,并将它们的数据组合成 transaction 对象,然后将该对象返回给应用层。
示例代码:
from fastapi import FastAPI, Depends
from typing import Dict
app = FastAPI()
# 假设的 Service 定义
class UserService:
def get_user(self, user_id: int) -> Dict:
# 模拟数据库查询
return {"user_id": user_id, "name": "Example User"}
class ProductService:
def get_product(self, product_id: int) -> Dict:
# 模拟数据库查询
return {"product_id": product_id, "name": "Example Product"}
class SaleService:
def get_sale(self, sale_id: int) -> Dict:
# 模拟数据库查询
return {"sale_id": sale_id, "amount": 100}
class TransactionService:
def __init__(self, user_service: UserService, product_service: ProductService, sale_service: SaleService):
self.user_service = user_service
self.product_service = product_service
self.sale_service = sale_service
def get_transaction(self, transaction_id: int) -> Dict:
user = self.user_service.get_user(1)
product = self.product_service.get_product(1)
sale = self.sale_service.get_sale(transaction_id)
transaction = {
"transaction_id": transaction_id,
"user": user,
"product": product,
"sale": sale,
}
return transaction
# 依赖注入
def get_user_service():
return UserService()
def get_product_service():
return ProductService()
def get_sale_service():
return SaleService()
def get_transaction_service(
user_service: UserService = Depends(get_user_service),
product_service: ProductService = Depends(get_product_service),
sale_service: SaleService = Depends(get_sale_service),
):
return TransactionService(user_service, product_service, sale_service)
# 端点定义
@app.get("/transactions/{transaction_id}")
async def get_transaction(
transaction_id: int,
transaction_service: TransactionService = Depends(get_transaction_service),
):
transaction = transaction_service.get_transaction(transaction_id)
return transaction优点:
缺点:
选择哪种方案取决于具体的应用场景和需求。以下是一些考虑因素:
总结:
两种方案都有其优缺点,选择哪种方案取决于具体的应用场景和需求。在选择方案时,需要仔细评估各种因素,并权衡其优缺点,以选择最适合的方案。重要的是保持代码的清晰性和可维护性,并确保应用程序的性能和可扩展性。
以上就是构建基于 FastAPI 的三层架构:多服务协同处理复杂端点的详细内容,更多请关注php中文网其它相关文章!
每个人都需要一台速度更快、更稳定的 PC。随着时间的推移,垃圾文件、旧注册表数据和不必要的后台进程会占用资源并降低性能。幸运的是,许多工具可以让 Windows 保持平稳运行。
Copyright 2014-2025 https://www.php.cn/ All Rights Reserved | php.cn | 湘ICP备2023035733号