
在开发过程中,我们经常会遇到需要根据特定条件动态调用不同函数的场景。一个常见的例子是,根据面试类型(如技术面试或hr面试)来验证招聘人员。然而,这些验证函数可能需要不同的参数。
考虑以下初始设计:
import { getHrRecruiters, getRecruiters } from '../queue';
import { validateTechnicalInterview } from './validateTechnicalInterview';
import { matchHrRecruiters } from './matchHrRecruiters';
import { THrInterviewer, THrRecruit, TRecruit } from '../../types';
export const recruitersCategoryHandlers = {
TECHNICAL_INTERVIEW: {
getter: getRecruiters,
setter: {
validateRecruiters: (
recruiters: THrInterviewer[],
recruit: TRecruit | THrRecruit
) => validateTechnicalInterview(recruiters, recruit),
},
},
HR_INTERVIEW: {
getter: getHrRecruiters,
setter: {
validateRecruiters: (
recruiters: THrInterviewer[],
recruit: TRecruit | THrRecruit,
param3: any,
param4: any
) => matchHrRecruiters(recruiters, recruit as THrRecruit, param3, param4),
},
},
};当尝试统一调用 validateRecruiters 时,问题便浮现了:
const matchedSlots = getMatchingSlots(
recruitersCategoryHandlers[
interviewCategory as EInterviewCategory
].setter.validateRecruiters(???), // 如何统一传递参数?
slotsWithEmail
);TECHNICAL_INTERVIEW 类型的 validateRecruiters 需要两个参数,而 HR_INTERVIEW 类型则需要四个参数。直接在调用点统一传递参数会变得非常困难,因为不同分支需要的参数数量和类型不一致,导致代码难以维护和扩展。
为了解决上述问题,我们可以采用策略模式。策略模式允许在运行时选择算法的行为。它通过定义一系列算法,将每一个算法封装起来,并使它们可以相互替换。这意味着,我们可以为每种面试类型定义一个“策略”,每个策略都封装了其特有的 validateRecruiters 逻辑,同时提供一个统一的接口。
首先,我们需要定义一个公共的接口或抽象类,所有具体策略都将实现或继承它。这个接口将包含 validateRecruiters 方法,并使用 ...params: any[] 来处理可变数量的参数,以确保接口的通用性。
// 定义策略接口
interface ValidateRecruitersStrategy {
validateRecruiters(recruiters: THrInterviewer[], recruit: TRecruit | THrRecruit, ...params: any[]): any;
}接下来,为每种面试类型创建具体的策略类,实现 ValidateRecruitersStrategy 接口。每个策略类将封装其特定的 validateRecruiters 逻辑。
// 实现技术面试策略
class TechnicalInterviewStrategy implements ValidateRecruitersStrategy {
validateRecruiters(recruiters: THrInterviewer[], recruit: TRecruit | THrRecruit): any {
// 技术面试只关心前两个参数
return validateTechnicalInterview(recruiters, recruit);
}
}
// 实现HR面试策略
class HrInterviewStrategy implements ValidateRecruitersStrategy {
validateRecruiters(recruiters: THrInterviewer[], recruit: TRecruit | THrRecruit, ...params: any[]): any {
// HR面试需要额外的参数,通过解构或直接传递...params来获取
const [param3, param4] = params;
return matchHrRecruiters(recruiters, recruit as THrRecruit, param3, param4);
}
}注意:在 HrInterviewStrategy 中,我们通过 ...params 接收所有额外参数,并根据需要解构或使用它们。而 TechnicalInterviewStrategy 虽然也接收 ...params,但它只使用了前两个必需参数,忽略了其余的。这是策略模式处理可变参数的关键。
现在,我们可以更新 recruitersCategoryHandlers 对象,使其不再直接包含匿名函数,而是引用具体的策略实例。
export const recruitersCategoryHandlers = {
TECHNICAL_INTERVIEW: {
getter: getRecruiters,
setter: new TechnicalInterviewStrategy(), // 使用策略实例
},
HR_INTERVIEW: {
getter: getHrRecruiters,
setter: new HrInterviewStrategy(), // 使用策略实例
},
};通过策略模式,现在可以统一地调用 validateRecruiters 方法,无论具体是哪种面试类型。所有可能的参数都可以在调用点传递,由具体的策略类决定如何使用它们。
// 假设已确定面试类别及其他所需参数
const interviewCategory = 'HR_INTERVIEW'; // 示例:可以是动态获取的值
const param3 = 'someValue3'; // 示例:根据业务逻辑传入
const param4 = 'someValue4'; // 示例:根据业务逻辑传入
const slotsWithEmail = {}; // 替换为实际值
const initialRecruiters = recruitersCategoryHandlers[interviewCategory].getter(); // 获取初始招聘者
// 统一调用 validateRecruiters
const matchedSlots = getMatchingSlots(
recruitersCategoryHandlers[interviewCategory].setter.validateRecruiters(
initialRecruiters,
slotsWithEmail, // 对应 recruit 参数
param3, // 对应 param3
param4 // 对应 param4
),
slotsWithEmail
);import { getHrRecruiters, getRecruiters } from '../queue';
import { validateTechnicalInterview } from './validateTechnicalInterview';
import { matchHrRecruiters } from './matchHrRecruiters';
import { THrInterviewer, THrRecruit, TRecruit } from '../../types'; // 假设类型定义存在
// 1. 定义策略接口
interface ValidateRecruitersStrategy {
validateRecruiters(recruiters: THrInterviewer[], recruit: TRecruit | THrRecruit, ...params: any[]): any;
}
// 2. 实现技术面试策略
class TechnicalInterviewStrategy implements ValidateRecruitersStrategy {
validateRecruiters(recruiters: THrInterviewer[], recruit: TRecruit | THrRecruit, ..._params: any[]): any {
// 技术面试只关心前两个参数,忽略 _params
console.log("Executing TechnicalInterviewStrategy...");
return validateTechnicalInterview(recruiters, recruit);
}
}
// 2. 实现HR面试策略
class HrInterviewStrategy implements ValidateRecruitersStrategy {
validateRecruiters(recruiters: THrInterviewer[], recruit: TRecruit | THrRecruit, ...params: any[]): any {
// HR面试需要额外的参数
console.log("Executing HrInterviewStrategy...");
const [param3, param4] = params;
return matchHrRecruiters(recruiters, recruit as THrRecruit, param3, param4);
}
}
// 3. 定义招聘者类别处理器,使用策略模式
export const recruitersCategoryHandlers = {
TECHNICAL_INTERVIEW: {
getter: getRecruiters,
setter: new TechnicalInterviewStrategy(),
},
HR_INTERVIEW: {
getter: getHrRecruiters,
setter: new HrInterviewStrategy(),
},
};
// 假设的外部函数和类型
function getMatchingSlots(validatedRecruiters: any, slots: any): any {
console.log("Getting matching slots with:", validatedRecruiters);
// 实际逻辑
return validatedRecruiters;
}
// 假设的类型 EInterviewCategory
type EInterviewCategory = 'TECHNICAL_INTERVIEW' | 'HR_INTERVIEW';
// 模拟外部依赖函数
function getRecruiters(): THrInterviewer[] { return [{ id: 'tech1' }]; }
function getHrRecruiters(): THrInterviewer[] { return [{ id: 'hr1' }]; }
function validateTechnicalInterview(recruiters: THrInterviewer[], recruit: TRecruit | THrRecruit): any {
console.log("validateTechnicalInterview called with:", recruiters, recruit);
return { validTechRecruiters: recruiters };
}
function matchHrRecruiters(recruiters: THrInterviewer[], recruit: THrRecruit, p3: any, p4: any): any {
console.log("matchHrRecruiters called with:", recruiters, recruit, p3, p4);
return { matchedHrRecruiters: recruiters, p3, p4 };
}
// --- 实际调用示例 ---
// 确定面试类别和所需参数
const interviewCategory: EInterviewCategory = 'HR_INTERVIEW'; // 也可以是 'TECHNICAL_INTERVIEW'
const recruitData: TRecruit | THrRecruit = { id: 'someRecruitId', name: 'John Doe' }; // 模拟 recruit 数据
const param3 = 'projectA';
const param4 = 'teamB';
const slotsWithEmail = { slot1: 'email1' }; // 模拟 slotsWithEmail
// 获取初始招聘者
const initialRecruiters = recruitersCategoryHandlers[interviewCategory].getter();
// 调用 validateRecruiters
const validatedResult = recruitersCategoryHandlers[interviewCategory].setter.validateRecruiters(
initialRecruiters,
recruitData,
param3,
param4
);
// 获取匹配的槽位
const matchedSlots = getMatchingSlots(validatedResult, slotsWithEmail);
console.log("Final matched slots:", matchedSlots);
// 另一个例子:TECHNICAL_INTERVIEW
const techInterviewCategory: EInterviewCategory = 'TECHNICAL_INTERVIEW';
const techRecruitData: TRecruit = { id: 'techRecruit', name: 'Jane Smith' };
const techInitialRecruiters = recruitersCategoryHandlers[techInterviewCategory].getter();
const techValidatedResult = recruitersCategoryHandlers[techInterviewCategory].setter.validateRecruiters(
techInitialRecruiters,
techRecruitData,
// 对于技术面试,这里即使传入 param3, param4 也会被 TechnicalInterviewStrategy 忽略
'extraParam1', 'extraParam2'
);
const techMatchedSlots = getMatchingSlots(techValidatedResult, slotsWithEmail);
console.log("Final matched slots for tech interview:", techMatchedSlots);灵活性和可扩展性:
代码清晰度与可维护性:
统一的调用接口:
类型安全(TypeScript):
通过引入策略模式,我们成功解决了在动态选择函数时,函数参数签名不一致的挑战。这种设计模式不仅使代码更加灵活、易于扩展,而且显著提升了代码的可读性和可维护性。在面对需要根据运行时条件执行不同行为的场景时,策略模式提供了一种优雅且强大的解决方案。
以上就是动态参数下函数调用的策略模式实践的详细内容,更多请关注php中文网其它相关文章!
每个人都需要一台速度更快、更稳定的 PC。随着时间的推移,垃圾文件、旧注册表数据和不必要的后台进程会占用资源并降低性能。幸运的是,许多工具可以让 Windows 保持平稳运行。
Copyright 2014-2025 https://www.php.cn/ All Rights Reserved | php.cn | 湘ICP备2023035733号